Timeshare Users Group Bulletin Boards
  All Point System Discussions
  Worldmark Non-Housekeeping Account (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | bbs help (faq) | search |

BBS Home > All Point System Discussions
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Worldmark Non-Housekeeping Account
FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 02-20-2005 00:44     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by PA:
READ MY LIPS! No more HK Fees! Even for trade credits.

PA,

What about extra mid-week HC's? My understanding is that you can get these at extra cost at some (maybe all) resorts. I am pretty sure that with a no-h account, we would still need to pay!

/Jim

IP: Logged

PA

TUG Member

Posts: 3846
From: San Antonio, TX 78258
Registered: Mar 2002

posted 02-20-2005 06:06     Click Here to See the Profile for PA   Click Here to Email PA     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by FLYNZ4:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PA:
[b] READ MY LIPS! No more HK Fees! Even for trade credits.


PA,

What about extra mid-week HC's? My understanding is that you can get these at extra cost at some (maybe all) resorts. I am pretty sure that with a no-h account, we would still need to pay!

/Jim[/B][/QUOTE]

Smart Alec. Had to prove me wrong.

IP: Logged

BocaBum99

TUG Member

Posts: 1506
From:
Registered: Jul 2004

posted 02-20-2005 06:09     Click Here to See the Profile for BocaBum99   Click Here to Email BocaBum99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Jim,

Since you are almost 100% able to get waitlist reservations, why don't you simply ask for 2 separate reservations at the same resort within the partial week timeframe. One for 3-days, one for 4-days. Then, you can get the midweek cleaning for free.

IP: Logged

FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 02-20-2005 16:39     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by BocaBum99:
Jim,

Since you are almost 100% able to get waitlist reservations, why don't you simply ask for 2 separate reservations at the same resort within the partial week timeframe. One for 3-days, one for 4-days. Then, you can get the midweek cleaning for free.



BocaBum,

The problem is that you are not guaranteed to stay in the same room... besides... I was just being a smart alec in proving PA wrong

BTW, I have never aked for a mid-week HC... nor do I think this is something we would generally want to do. As contrasted to a hotel, I actually prefer that no maid is coming into our unit every day. In fact, when I stay in hotels, I often keep the do not disturb sign up for days at a time now.

/Jim

IP: Logged

dcwcce

TUG Member

Posts: 247
From: On an Airplane
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 02-27-2005 05:21     Click Here to See the Profile for dcwcce     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
The ebay auction os now at $1.34+ a credit
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4354708802&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT

Lets see ((1.34-.80)*6000)/35 = 92 2nd Weeks or Weekends
Since the heaser doesn't list maintenace fees do some of the bidders think they have no annual charge at all?

------------------
It's been 89 minutes where's my free gift
dcw_ts@yahoo.com

IP: Logged

FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 02-27-2005 18:02     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by dcwcce:
The ebay auction os now at $1.34+ a credit
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4354708802&ssPageName=STRK:M EWA:IT

Lets see ((1.34-.80)*6000)/35 = 92 2nd Weeks or Weekends
Since the heaser doesn't list maintenace fees do some of the bidders think they have no annual charge at all?


I think it is more fair to use ~$50/housekeeping. Even still, it is about 65 free housekeepings. There are certainly people who would benefit from that over just a few years.

I am glad that I got my no-h MUCH cheaper than this... but if I didn't have a no-h account, I would pay this premium (if it was my only way to get a no-h account) since I would break even in less than 2 years. I admit that my WM usage is very atypical.

/Jim

[This message has been edited by FLYNZ4 (edited 02-27-2005).]

IP: Logged

SheilaB

TUG Member

Posts: 67
From: Vancouver, Canada
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 03-02-2005 19:49     Click Here to See the Profile for SheilaB   Click Here to Email SheilaB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Wow - that 6000 credit no HK membership auction on eBay just ended, and it went for $11,100!!!! That is $1.85 a credit! I bid on it up to $1.30 a credit, but that was as much of a premium as I was willing to pay (and after doing the math, I decided even that was too high, so I was glad I was outbid). It had sat at $8250 for the last few days, and then just before ending there were three bidders who pushed it up to it's final price. Unbelievable! That is $6300 more than a regular 6000 credit membership routinely goes for on eBay. Jim - even at your rate, it would take a long time for that to pay for itself!
Sheila

IP: Logged

BocaBum99

TUG Member

Posts: 1506
From:
Registered: Jul 2004

posted 03-03-2005 03:18     Click Here to See the Profile for BocaBum99   Click Here to Email BocaBum99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Well, I think we now know the first capability that Trendwest will put into its VIP program. No housekeeping. I guess the market's belief is that the "potential" of getting something for free is worth more than actually getting it. At that rate, I'd rather pay the housekeeping fees.

IP: Logged

smmora

TUG Member

Posts: 179
From: Livermore, CA
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 03-03-2005 08:42     Click Here to See the Profile for smmora     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Even though I think its unlikely
I'm hoping it falls through so I can buy it at $11,000

I figure it would take 10 years or less for me to break even.
I'm only 30 so I plan on using it for a lot more years.
And we would easily take a minimum of 1 (3day) weekend a month, if I had no housekeeping.
Not to mention piggy-backing resorts for 1 day here, 1 day there

------------------
Smmora

IP: Logged

Judy321

TUG Member

Posts: 986
From:
Registered: Mar 2004

posted 03-03-2005 14:54     Click Here to See the Profile for Judy321   Click Here to Email Judy321     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Maz:
...I paid around 25 cents a point for a no hk 8000 credit membership so I didnt have to worry much about the math

Maz, I've been hearing about your legendary 25 cent a point Worldmark contract for a while now, but don't now the details. How long have you had this? Was this an eBay "Buy It Now" purchase (like CZ's $1000 Christmas Mountain Village UDI), or something else?

IP: Logged

FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 03-03-2005 17:59     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by BocaBum99:
Well, I think we now know the first capability that Trendwest will put into its VIP program. No housekeeping. I guess the market's belief is that the "potential" of getting something for free is worth more than actually getting it. At that rate, I'd rather pay the housekeeping fees.

I do not think that TW could implement a free HC program unless they paid WM the $35 - $85 (avg $50) HC fee every time one of their VIPs made a reservation. That seems very unlikely to me.

/Jim

IP: Logged

Maz

TUG Member

Posts: 2766
From: Scottsdale,Arizona
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 03-03-2005 18:00     Click Here to See the Profile for Maz   Click Here to Email Maz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Judy321:
Maz, I've been hearing about your legendary 25 cent a point Worldmark contract for a while now, but don't now the details. How long have you had this? Was this an eBay "Buy It Now" purchase (like CZ's $1000 Christmas Mountain Village UDI), or something else?



Judy,

Mine wasnt from eBay...It was from a private party who really disliked the wm system. They didnt want to own it anymore so I helped them find a way out. I probably could have negotiated a better price but I didnt want to mess around. I picked up an additional 8000 credits (regular ownership) for around $2400...I actually paid more for my housekeeping ownership than I did for my no hk...Maz

------------------
My Website
Westin St. John
Marriott-Canyon Villas
Marriott Park City
Oregon Coastal
Fairfield Points
Worldmark/Trendwest
Punta Mita,Mx.(Non-Timeshare)

IP: Logged

BocaBum99

TUG Member

Posts: 1506
From:
Registered: Jul 2004

posted 03-03-2005 20:03     Click Here to See the Profile for BocaBum99   Click Here to Email BocaBum99     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by FLYNZ4:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BocaBum99:
[b]Well, I think we now know the first capability that Trendwest will put into its VIP program. No housekeeping. I guess the market's belief is that the "potential" of getting something for free is worth more than actually getting it. At that rate, I'd rather pay the housekeeping fees.


I do not think that TW could implement a free HC program unless they paid WM the $35 - $85 (avg $50) HC fee every time one of their VIPs made a reservation. That seems very unlikely to me.

/Jim[/B][/QUOTE]

Is there something in the bylaws that prevents it? How did they sell no housekeeping fee memberships in the first place if it can't be done again?

Why would TW have to pay for the HK fee? Do they currently pay HK for the current no HK fee memberships?

All this will do is raise the cost of operating WM which they could later argue is the cause of an increase of MF.

IP: Logged

FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 03-03-2005 23:32     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by BocaBum99:
Is there something in the bylaws that prevents it? How did they sell no housekeeping fee memberships in the first place if it can't be done again?

Why would TW have to pay for the HK fee? Do they currently pay HK for the current no HK fee memberships?

All this will do is raise the cost of operating WM which they could later argue is the cause of an increase of MF.



BocaBum,

The original memberships did not have HC fees. Back then, I believe it was called "Club Esprit". When WM was formed, they instituted HC fees, but they grandfathered the orginal members since the terms of their original purchase was for no housekeeping fees.

Currently TW does not pay the HC fees of the original members as far as I know... but once again... that was instituted at the inception of WM.

/Jim

IP: Logged

PA

TUG Member

Posts: 3846
From: San Antonio, TX 78258
Registered: Mar 2002

posted 03-04-2005 03:31     Click Here to See the Profile for PA   Click Here to Email PA     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
I haven't seen anything in the bylaws that prevents Trendwest from marketing a no-HK account. I guess they could do what they want.

However, I don't think, long term, it would increase the price substantially that TW can sell at, since for the average owner it only increases their value by a few hundred dollars per year at most. I think it would only have the effect of de-valuing all the regular ownerships.

The average rube that buys from TW doesn't know squat about the market, or they wouldn't be buying in the first place. They're not going to pay thousands more for a non-HK account.

As for people knowledgeable about the aftermarket? Consider Fairfield. VIP is worth something. To some people, it's worth a LOT. Most people, however, are of the opinion that they'll just buy twice as many points on the resale market and not be VIP. Plus, since they can buy at the sold-out resorts with lower maintenance fees than the newer resorts, they can still have maint. fees around the same price. AND, when they go to sell, they'll get their money back.

If TW greatly reduced the value of existing contracts, people knowledgeable about the aftermarket would just buy more points on the resale market, rather than buy from the developer to get the perks.

Anything Trendwest does to de-value resale points will temporarily help their sales, and long term will destroy their company, I believe. I also believe that is the path they are trying to pursue. It takes much less brilliance to de-value existing than it does to come up with a new sales model.

IP: Logged

Judy321

TUG Member

Posts: 986
From:
Registered: Mar 2004

posted 03-04-2005 21:19     Click Here to See the Profile for Judy321   Click Here to Email Judy321     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Maz:

Judy,
Mine wasnt from eBay...It was from a private party who really disliked the wm system. They didnt want to own it anymore so I helped them find a way out....

Thanks, Maz. I'm surprised that you found so one who was so unhappy with WM -- they seem to have a lot of satisfied customers.

IP: Logged

mtngal

TUG Member

Posts: 319
From: Frazier Park, CA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted 03-05-2005 07:52     Click Here to See the Profile for mtngal   Click Here to Email mtngal     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
WM is like many other timeshares - people buy blindly at presentations with unrealistic expectations put in their heads by salesmen who mislead them. When they discover that they can't just call a week ahead and get into the popular Oregon Coast resorts on bonus time in the summer, they get discouraged and angry. They either figure out how to use the system to meet their needs (which is not very difficult to do) or they realize that they bought a program that won't work for them - like all timeshares, it isn't for everyone.

IP: Logged

FLYNZ4

TUG Member

Posts: 172
From: Portland OR
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 03-05-2005 17:07     Click Here to See the Profile for FLYNZ4   Click Here to Email FLYNZ4     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
quote:
Originally posted by PerryM:
A no-housekeeping account makes sense if the numbers work out.

Take the sale from Jeff Fudge:
15,000 credits at $1.25 each = $18,750.
30,000 credits came with the account, to me a “fully loaded account” would have 15,000 so sell 15,000 at 4 cents each = $600.

Cost to buy the account was $18,750 - $600 = $18,150 plus closing costs.

A normal 15,000 credit “fully loaded account” is 80 cents each = $12,000.

The lucky owner paid $6,150 more than resale.

At $50 a cleaning that means he will break even in 123 extra visits to WM.

If you did one WM stay per month = 12 per year = 10 years to payback the extra money.

Now if our new owner is a WM fanatic like some of you I know (I won’t mention a fly boy I know) I guess payback would be just a few years.

To me the price seemed too high.

I have a question for WM aficionados: do TW Trade Points qualify for NH if your primary WM account is NH? I’m guessing no.

Perry


Perry,

I just reviewed my reservation history, and did the calculations, and at the rate that I use WM weekends... this account would have just about paid for itself. I got my no-h account in June of '03.... so about 2+ years, counting the vacations taken to date, plus my pending reservations over the next 13 months. Of course, I paid much less... but the no-h accounts have risen dramatically since '03.

Regarding the other 6000 point no-h account that sold on Ebay for 11,000+... consider the following:

If the owner bought a 14,000 point contract instead for the same $11,000, nobody would be saying they got a bad deal. Of course, this buyer received 8000 annual credits less, but in return got a no-h account.

Next... would you rather have a 14,000 point standard account, or a 6000 point no-h account? I think that for a lot of people, the no-h account would be a better deal. For starters, you could rent 8000 points every year for about $0.06 each... minus the $0.04 MF you would not have to pay... so the net cost per credit would only be $0.02. So, if the no-h account is worth $160/year to you... then it was not a bad deal.

/Jim

[This message has been edited by FLYNZ4 (edited 03-05-2005).]

IP: Logged

PerryM

TUG Member

Posts: 1542
From: Ballwin, MO, Park Plaza in Park City; WorldMark &TrendWest; RCI Points; Windjammer tall ship; SA
Registered: May 2002

posted 03-05-2005 20:02     Click Here to See the Profile for PerryM   Click Here to Email PerryM     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Jim,

Regardless of how we analyze usage one thing is for certain I believe a new “floor” has been established with NH credits. I have a gut feeling that $1.25 per credit is history and higher prices will be demanded. I can’t guess how high, but higher.

I don’t think a NH account will make any difference to the average WM owner, thus the extra cost is just a waste of money.

There are WM aficionados out there who would greatly benefit from a NH account at almost any price – given enough usage and enough time; one of them is named Jim!

We are interested in purchasing a NH account since we plan to make to maximize our WM usage in the next 20 years – so we are one of the folks who will pay a ridiculous price for a NH account – within limits. The eBay auction the other day went beyond my definition of ridiculous!

There are enough of these accounts that surface during the year so paying absurd prices is not necessary. Hopefully the auction will coax other WM owners with NH accounts to sell them.

Perry

------------------
Have snowboard - will travel

IP: Logged

Hatrack79

TUG Member

Posts: 1818
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2001

posted 04-14-2005 10:22     Click Here to See the Profile for Hatrack79   Click Here to Email Hatrack79     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
Not my advertisement; no benefit to me...

Here's another Worldmark Non-housekeeping account for sale:

This time they're asking $1.50/credit:

/////////////////////THIS WILL NOT LAST LONG////////////////////////
..........NO HOUSEKEEPING CONTRACT.............

6K ANNUAL WITH 11,700 UNUSED, DEC ANNIVERSARY FOR $9000
........CONTACT......JEFF FUDGE, RPMI REALTY, 800-844-8404,
jeff@jkor.com...........................

IP: Logged

SharonD

TUG Member

Posts: 605
From: Salt Lake City
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 04-14-2005 15:14     Click Here to See the Profile for SharonD   Click Here to Email SharonD     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote Post A Reply
It sold within 40 minutes.

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are in Pacific Timezone

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | TUG Home | Privacy Statement

Copyright Timeshare User's Group - BBS Script customized by Laurence Chan lcc_home@hotmail.com
The Timeshare Users Group (TUG) makes no representations or warranties with respect to the use of the TUG bulletin boards, or their contents and further makes no representations with respect to the results that may be obtained from information on the BBS. The Timeshare Users Group shall not be liable for any damage or loss of any type arising from such use or content, and reserves the right to remove any posting on the bulletin boards. The bulletin boards are intended for use by Timeshare Users Group members, Non member postings are welcome. Advertising is not permitted on the BBS, TUG provides other areas on this web site for advertising. Any messages that are deemed as advertising will be deleted. Please read the full TUG BBS Usage agreement located in the FAQ. By using the BBS you accept and agree with the above statements. If you do not agree please return to the TUG Home Page

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a