Author
|
Topic: Interval International--Ask Craig
|
mas TUG VolunteerPosts: 855 From: Twin Cities area, Owner:Marriott Cypress Harbour & Beach Place, Kona Coast II Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-13-2002 08:49
quote: Originally posted by EZ-ED: Craig,I like the new user interface on the II website. Your staff did good. Now if I could just get that MKO trade... LOL Regards
I second EZ-ED's comments re the new look. I have one comment, however, regarding the shop feature. It seems obvious, at least to me, that if people are interested in depositing and actually requesting a trade that they will use the deposit button/option and if they are simply interested in, either what's currently available, or a snapshot of what their resort will pull [admittedly an inaccurate picture of trading power, given the setup] then they would select the 'shop' option/button. Assuming this scenario is true, why do you bother asking for a Marriott confirmation # with the shop option? Most people just make up a bogus 8-digit # beginning with 8 anyway. P.S. Thanks for getting my MKO exchange
|
EdB TUG MemberPosts: 7145 From: Arizona Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-13-2002 10:25
I like the new user interface too. And the 5 star logos are back!
|
EdB TUG MemberPosts: 7145 From: Arizona Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-13-2002 14:08
One problem with the new interface...in the drop-down list of regions, US-Southwest is no longer available! Seems like I recall this happening with the last redesign as well...
|
Acres TUG MemberPosts: 16 From: Canada Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-13-2002 14:34
I just went to the Interval International site. This is the first time I have been there since its changed. When I logged on it Microsoft internet explorer warned me the site was not secure. I never had this happen before. How do I correct it?Lynn
|
EdB TUG MemberPosts: 7145 From: Arizona Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-13-2002 15:53
quote: Originally posted by Acres: I just went to the Interval International site. This is the first time I have been there since its changed. When I logged on it Microsoft internet explorer warned me the site was not secure. I never had this happen before. How do I correct it?Lynn
That's not what the warning says. After you log in, it warns you that you are moving from a secure page to a non-secure page. This is normal, and in fact it's a good thing. In its old design, the II Web site required a secure page for everything, which slows response times way down. Now, you are only required to visit a secure page when you are actually entering information such as a password or a credit card number. To see whether a page is secure, look first at the Address bar, where you'll see an address that begins with https://. Then look at the bottom of the page for a padlock icon. You should see both items on the login page. You should also see them whenever you confirm an exchange or do anything else that requires you to enter data, although I haven't done this yet. Ed
|
Acres TUG MemberPosts: 16 From: Canada Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-13-2002 16:51
After I enter my acc# plus password this is what it says:You are about to be redirected to a connection that is not secure. The information you are send to the current site may be transmitted to a non-secure site. Do you wish to continue? If I say yes then the padlock is gone and so it the s on the htttp. Lynn
|
EdB TUG MemberPosts: 7145 From: Arizona Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-13-2002 17:14
quote: Originally posted by Acres: After I enter my acc# plus password this is what it says:You are about to be redirected to a connection that is not secure. The information you are send to the current site may be transmitted to a non-secure site. Do you wish to continue? If I say yes then the padlock is gone and so it the s on the htttp. Lynn
Yes, that's exactly what I described. The message comes as you leave the page. When you go to the new page, it's no longer secure. But you're not entering a password there, so it doesn;t need to be secure.
This page is operating exactly as it's supposed to. Relax! (PS: I do know what I'm talking about, honest. Go to Amazon.com and you'll see that I'm the author of Microsoft Windows Security Inside Out, published by Microsoft Press. Hope that helps you feel just a bit more comfortable!)
|
somerville TUG MemberPosts: 1419 From: Vienna, VA, USA: 7 Mile Beach Resort, Grand Cayman, WK 51; Beach Quarters, VA Beach, WK 26; Equivest Points; Barony Beach, HHI; Hanalei Bay Resort Registered: FEB 2001
|
posted 10-14-2002 05:59
Craig, Kudos to II for allowing me to shop my Equivest points on the new website.
|
JeffW TUG MemberPosts: 1564 From: Philadelphia Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-14-2002 06:12
One problem I noticed with the new site is that after you found some resort matches, either if you go 'Back', or you select 'More Search Options', it doesn't save your list of destinations (I think maybe the general (top) area is saved, but the specific (bottom) area) isn't). This is not the same behavior of the old version, and can be a hassle when trying to check availability at the same areas over different checkin periods.Jeff
|
sheila999 unregistered TUG MemberPosts: 1564 From: Philadelphia Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-14-2002 07:32
I am an ILX owner and this was not the case for me and my 2001 deposit.At that time, my exchange certificate had a 6-digit number that began with a 9. Also, I saw my week online at Intervalworld as a bonus week 61 or 60 (forget which), not as an ILX deposit. I was upset because I knew it was NOT a bonus week, but II told me that is how they had to enter my ILX week in their system. I also received a bonus week certificate with a 7-digit number that began with a 1. I used both of these weeks without a problem. I do not know if things are/were different for 2002 or 2003, but for 2001, II used some kind of fake bonus week for my exchange week--I was happy with the exchange I got (Cameron House in Scotland) so if II has to pretend my week is a bonus week in order for their system to process it but still give me a good exchange, then that's OK with me. quote:
YesLet me make sure I understand this correctly, I real deposit certificate would be a 7 diget number starting with a 7 ?
[This message has been edited by sheila999 (edited 10-14-2002).]
|
KittyKat TUG MemberPosts: 417 From: Sheffield, England Registered: JUL 2001
|
posted 10-14-2002 07:53
CraigI was just about to message you with thanks for the new site in allowing us point owners (in my case GVC) to use the shop facility when I notice the facility had gone! Is this a case of now you to see it now you don't! Or is it a case of all the traffic on the new exchange system has caused it to go down? Anyway from what I saw briefly it looked good. Kitty
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 15:27
The enhancement this weekend allows members who own at "points resorts" to facilitate their transactions online. However, the resort/group has the ability to dictate whether we allow online access. GVC has chosen not to offer this service as they want to ensure they are the point of contact for all transactions. quote: Originally posted by KittyKat: CraigI was just about to message you with thanks for the new site in allowing us point owners (in my case GVC) to use the shop facility when I notice the facility had gone! Is this a case of now you to see it now you don't! Or is it a case of all the traffic on the new exchange system has caused it to go down? Anyway from what I saw briefly it looked good. Kitty
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 15:28
We will address this issue. quote: Originally posted by JeffW: One problem I noticed with the new site is that after you found some resort matches, either if you go 'Back', or you select 'More Search Options', it doesn't save your list of destinations (I think maybe the general (top) area is saved, but the specific (bottom) area) isn't). This is not the same behavior of the old version, and can be a hassle when trying to check availability at the same areas over different checkin periods.Jeff
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 15:29
Noted...we should have it resolved soon. quote: Originally posted by EdB: One problem with the new interface...in the drop-down list of regions, US-Southwest is no longer available! Seems like I recall this happening with the last redesign as well...
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
Marina_K TUG MemberPosts: 6170 From: Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-14-2002 15:29
quote: Originally posted by CraigU: The enhancement this weekend allows members who own at "points resorts" to facilitate their transactions online. However, the resort/group has the ability to dictate whether we allow online access. GVC has chosen not to offer this service as they want to ensure they are the point of contact for all transactions.
Would that be the same for Club Sunterra members too? ------------------ Marina Mexico Reviews [This message has been edited by Marina_K (edited 10-14-2002).]
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 15:31
Hmmm...good question. I will look into it for you. quote: Originally posted by Marina_K: Would that be the same for Club Sunterra members too?
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
SydneyTugger TUG MemberPosts: 1237 From: Sydney, Australia Registered: AUG 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 16:47
I was really excited when I read about II's new website and thought that maybe we could now access online transactions. It seemed encouraging when I entered our log-in detail and was able to access our profile. Alas. That's as far as we could go. Still. Our 3 yr membership expires Aug 2003. I wonder whether we'll have access before then? Thanks for being on Tug Craig.------------------ Lang
|
Dean TUG MemberPosts: 2683 From: Disney's Old Key West, Marriott's Grande Ocean, Marriott's Harbour Pt. and La Cabana, Aruba Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-15-2002 04:41
The site looks much better and the "details" button off of the My units page now works correctly for my Mac. Thanks.------------------ Dean My Timeshare Page
|
pwrshift TUG MemberPosts: 2764 From: Toronto Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-15-2002 12:19
Craig, I have a Marriott Beach Place MBP studio on deposit with II and noted on the new site that II has it listed as 'sleeps 2', yet it would easily sleep 4 with the king bed plus sofa bed. Does this incorrect number of sleepers affect the trading power of this deposit?Brian ------------------ Those who dream most, do most.
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-15-2002 14:14
Unit capacity is determined by the number of adults with private sleeping arrangements. In this case, the guest suite sleeps two privately. quote: Originally posted by pwrshift: Craig, I have a Marriott Beach Place MBP studio on deposit with II and noted on the new site that II has it listed as 'sleeps 2', yet it would easily sleep 4 with the king bed plus sofa bed. Does this incorrect number of sleepers affect the trading power of this deposit?Brian
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
elaineUK TUG MemberPosts: 486 From: leeds, uk Registered: MAY 2002
|
posted 10-16-2002 13:47
Craig Please pass on my congratulations to the staff who have obviously worked hard in updating the II web site. I can do all the things that I used to do, so I'm a happy bunny.But being in IT myself, I just can't resist making a suggestion.... When I go through the resort directory & I find a resort I really like, wouldn't it be absolutely great, if I could click a button & it would list all the availability spots for that particular resort. Would anyone else think this is a useful option? Furthermore, when reviewing Getaways, I often see advertised great offers, but when I click on the link, it tells me there is no availability! Naturally, it's a marketing ploy to make me have a look, but personally, I find it quite frustrating. Elaine BTW - since I live in the UK, when I log in, I get diverted to the uk site. Which is fine, but there could be differences....
|
judy.f TUG MemberPosts: 173 From: Nashville, TN - Marriott Monarch at Sea Pines Registered: AUG 2001
|
posted 10-16-2002 16:54
Question on the new website (which I like, by the way): I have an exchange for next summer which I can view on the exchange information page. The week number for both weeks is the same, although the dates are different (relinquished property shows Monarch, week 12, March 29 checkin, exchange shows Imperial Palms, week 12, July 6 checkin). I'm just wondering if the program is functioning as designed or if the exchange week should show the week number that corresponds with the dates of the exchange and not the dates of the relinquished week. Hope this makes sense, thanks for all your help! Judy ------------------ ffelix@comcast.net
|
CraigU TUG MemberPosts: 2331 From: Miami, Florida USA Registered: JUN 2002
|
posted 10-16-2002 17:40
The week number is not always the same at every resort. Sometimes it varies by check in date. It is also possible someone keyed in the wrong week number. Don't worry though, the dates are the focus when we verify the information with the resort. quote: Originally posted by judy.f: Question on the new website (which I like, by the way): I have an exchange for next summer which I can view on the exchange information page. The week number for both weeks is the same, although the dates are different (relinquished property shows Monarch, week 12, March 29 checkin, exchange shows Imperial Palms, week 12, July 6 checkin). I'm just wondering if the program is functioning as designed or if the exchange week should show the week number that corresponds with the dates of the exchange and not the dates of the relinquished week. Hope this makes sense, thanks for all your help! Judy
------------------ Craig Urbine Vice President Member Services Interval International
|
judy.f TUG MemberPosts: 173 From: Nashville, TN - Marriott Monarch at Sea Pines Registered: AUG 2001
|
posted 10-16-2002 17:50
Thanks for the quick answer! The human factor probably explains this particular instance. I knew that different resorts have slightly different calendars - Monarch is one of them - but I was a little concerned that week 12 appeared to be in March at one resort and July at the other! It's reassuring to know, though, that the dates are what really matters, not the week numbers. This is my first exchange, so I'm probably being a little more paranoid than necessary!Judy quote: Originally posted by CraigU: The week number is not always the same at every resort. Sometimes it varies by check in date. It is also possible someone keyed in the wrong week number. Don't worry though, the dates are the focus when we verify the information with the resort.
------------------ ffelix@comcast.net
|
pwrshift TUG MemberPosts: 2764 From: Toronto Registered: DEC 2000
|
posted 10-16-2002 18:09
Craig...I'm having a little difficulty understanding your answer. Are you saying you can only have one person per bed or sofabed? If so, that would mean the full 2 bdrm suite at Marriott Beach Place would only sleep 4, not 8 as you list. How do you arrive at the 'sleeps 8' designation for MBP if you don't count the guest suite (with king and sofabed) as sleeping 4?Brian quote: Originally posted by CraigU: Unit capacity is determined by the number of adults with private sleeping arrangements. In this case, the guest suite sleeps two privately.
------------------ Those who dream most, do most.
|